Only very limited materials can qualify for the lower rate of landfill tax. In order to qualify they have to be:
- Materials which are specifically listed in the Landfill Tax (Qualifying Material) Order 2011 (QMO);
- Compliant with the additional conditions and notes in the schedule to the QMO; and
- Accompanied by a waste transfer note which accurately describes the waste in terms which relate to the QMO.
Processed wastes from waste recycling activities, referred to as ‘qualifying fines’, can also qualify for the lower rate of tax provided that:
- They are comprised mainly of materials listed in the QMO; and
- The prescriptive guidance for ‘qualifying fines’ set out in the sections of public notice LFT1 which have the force of law is followed.
The significant differential in the rates of landfill tax, at nearly £99 per tonne, means that potential issues can quickly result in very large amounts of additional tax being due.
The tax authorities have been focussing closely on compliance with the rules for lower rate disposals for a number of years. Common errors that occur:
- Waste transfer note descriptions are written for operational reasons to comply with Duty of Care requirements, and the descriptions used can often be too vague;
- The ‘qualifying fines’ rules in LFT1 are complex, resulting in inadvertent compliance errors being missed; and
- The materials being deposited do not match precisely with the QMO which is both narrow and prescriptive.
In the recent case of Singleton Birch Limited and FCC Recycling (UK) Limited v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 619 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal found that an acidic ferrous chloride waste generated by a titanium dioxide facility qualified for the lower rate of landfill tax when it was treated on site using virgin slaked lime, but did not qualify for the lower rate of landfill tax when it was treated by FCC using Air Pollution Control Residue they had collected from a different process.
Without delving into the chemistry, in essence the neutralisation reactions from both treatment processes involved treatment of the ferrous chloride with calcium, but the resulting tax treatment was different due to the narrow construction of the QMO. A salutary lesson for those sending qualifying materials to landfill.