Wavering public sentiment and government support
Public sentiment towards tackling climate change is wavering in some developed countries. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak recently announced a delay to several green policies - and a YouGov survey showed that the majority (51%) of people agreed with him. Of those surveyed, 60% do not believe that net zero can be reached by 2050 without higher costs to ordinary people.
A survey conducted for the Economist in 2023 showed that less than 40% of people from countries including Germany, the US and France would be willing to pay more tax to prevent climate change.
In the US, there is a highly diverse range of opinions. Former president Donald Trump and some in the Republican party are suspicious of energy transition targets and wary about being dependent on China as a supplier of green technology. Only 21% of Republican voters believe climate change is caused by human activity, against 87% of Democrat voters.[3]
A divided world
Despite efforts in the West to reduce CO2 emissions, emerging economies continue to pump out more carbon. In 2023, developing countries accounted for around 67% of total global carbon emissions.[4] This is due to the emerging world being far behind the West in terms of economic development.
For example, although China is the largest producer and exporter of clean technology, coal is still used for 70% of their electricity grids.[5] China’s primary goal of becoming the lead economic superpower by 2049 will take precedence over their carbon emissions.
Law of diminishing returns
Investment in green projects is being made all over the world. Some argue that we are on the verge of a technological revolution, emphasised by the reduction in costs renewable technology seen over the past few decades.8
Yet, further productivity gains are limited by the law of physics. For example, the Betz limit of 60% refers to the theoretical maximum efficiency of a wind turbine in converting kinetic energy to electrical energy. The current conversion efficiency is 45%.[6] This suggests much of the technology gains from wind turbines have already happened.
The industry’s exponential progression could be unsustainable as we approach these physical limits and the room for revolutionary progress decreases. The law of diminishing returns applies as the cost reductions seen in solar and wind power decelerate, with every incremental gain yielding less progress than before.
Intermittency issues
Even if technological advances allowed wind and solar to operate at maximum efficiency, any gains would go to waste as there’s no viable energy storage solution available now.
That’s why there is still a reliance on fossil fuels to provide a constant source of energy during peak times.
Rising costs and land usage
The increasing costs of mining and the materials used to make batteries for electronic vehicles have seen prices soar and this has been passed onto consumers[7].
What’s more, wind and solar farms require a lot of space, and this is another reason why they’re becoming unpopular.
As a result, offshore wind farms have become more attractive. However, rising Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) for offshore wind, which increased by 50% from 2021, mainly due to hikes in interest rates, has increased the cost of energy production and threatens to reverse the savings renewable energy has provided over the last decade.[8]
Competition and geopolitics
Global cooperation is at the heart of a successful energy transition, but geopolitical risk has intensified due to rising tensions between China and the US. The US is actively hostile to investment from China under new transitionary regulations and aims to cut China from its supply chain to secure energy independence.[9]
However, China is the established world leader in clean technology and scale of production by cost. It’s a position unlikely to be usurped by the US. By excluding China, the US is slowing the clean energy transition.
Infrastructure challenges
Increased investment is often met with infrastructure challenges, which prevent renewable power from supplying a larger share of the electricity grid. Unlike China, which has increased its high voltage transmission lines more in the past decade than the US, Europe, Brazil and India combined, the US suffers from higher construction costs and permitting issues.9 China’s power grid is already much larger with higher capacity, and a higher annual growth rate of 7.5%, compared to 1% in the US and Europe.9